Docs

How this works, what it can't claim, and what would prove the privacy claim false.

How it works

How a note becomes a point on the mapA flow diagram with three stages in a row: chunk, embed, project. An arrow leads from chunk to embed, and another from embed to project. A fourth, curved arrow in amber leads from project back to chunk, labelled "recompute on every add, edit, or remove" — showing that the whole pipeline reruns on every change, which is why a note's position on the map is relative to the current set of notes, not a fixed coordinate.chunkembedprojectrecompute on every add, edit, or remove

A pasted note is split into sentence-bounded chunks (never more than 3 sentences or 80 subword tokens, whichever comes first), each chunk is embedded into a 384-dimension vector entirely on-device, and the whole current set of chunk embeddings is projected onto its own top-2 principal components to draw the map. That last step — project — reruns from scratch on every add, edit, or remove (the amber edge above), which is why the map's own caption says a note's position is relative to what you've pasted and will shift, not a fixed measurement. Search ranks over the finer-grained chunks; the map, clustering, and outlier detection operate on each note's centroid (the mean of its own chunks' embeddings) — two different granularities, used for two different questions, never conflated.

Limitations

The single most important limitation is demonstrated live, not just described: /limits shows that this technique measures how similar two sentences' wording is, not whether they mean the same thing — a flat contradiction can score as similar as, or more similar than, a genuine paraphrase. Nothing on this site should be read as the model detecting agreement, confirmation, or factual consistency.

Privacy, and how to prove it wrong

The claim: nothing you paste, type, search, or cluster is ever sent anywhere. Chunking, embedding, projection, search ranking, clustering, and outlier detection all run in this tab, most of them inside a Web Worker, using a model that was fetched once from a public CDN and cached by the browser afterward.

The condition that would make this claim false: any network request whose URL, query string, or request body encodes a fragment of text you actually typed or pasted. That's it — that is the one thing that isn't supposed to happen, ever, at any point in this product.

Don't take the live request counter's word for it. Open your browser's dev tools, go to the Network tab, and paste something — the only requests a cold visit makes are for this page's own static assets, the model runtime from cdn.jsdelivr.net, and the model weights themselves from huggingface.co (once, cached after). Typing, pasting, editing, searching, and clustering should never add a single row to that list. If you ever see one that does, that is a real bug — the source is public and every one of these claims is checkable against it, not just this page's word.